Requests from verified owners, in a sealed round, arriving with the property's permit history and the equipment already identified.
We asked what makes lead platforms not worth it. These are the answers, and what we do about each.
The line we actually serve on the inbox, not a brochure promise: "No lead fees — responding is what your seat buys, and a success fee applies only on a job you win." That fee is around 5% of job value, exempt on small jobs and capped, against an industry norm nearer 10%.
Each brief carries its own recipient count on the card — "sealed · 5 firms" — so you know the odds before you spend time on it. Competitors never see your option, and responding first isn't what wins.
Every request comes from someone who proved they own the property. It's a badge we can put on honestly because ownership is verified before a request can be published at all.
A measured brief arrives as "≈18.6 SQ (est.)" with ridge cap, drip edge and a recommended waste percentage — quantities only, never prices, so you apply your own list. The tier is earned, not asserted: benchmarked against hundreds of permits where the installing contractor declared the exact squares, half of our measurements on mostly-visible roofs land within about ten percent of the contractor's own figure. Where tree canopy obscured the roof, the tier drops, the brief says what share was inferred, and the edge lengths are flagged verify on site. Where there's no measurement at all it reads "size unmeasured" rather than inventing a number — so you know before rolling a truck how much weight the number will bear.
After a storm, the question isn't which county was affected — it's which specific homes took stones large enough to matter and haven't had work done since. That's a computed answer here rather than a canvassing route, and the owner is the one who chooses to ask for quotes.
You arrive knowing the machine and the house. The pipeline status is the same vocabulary you already use, so nothing has to be learned.